Following the Fei Protocol falling short of expectations at the beginning of April, much ink has been spilled on the doomed design of the FEI stablecoin and the possible ways to recover. Covalent’s latest findings in Cointelegraph Consulting’s biweekly newsletter adds up to the discussion by taking a closer look at how the Fei Protocol post-genesis drama unfolded, by the numbers.

Three weeks ago, Fei Protocol raised 639,000 Ether (ETH) worth roughly $1.3 billion at the end of the genesis event. The data reveals that the event attracted 17,567 unique users, but it turned out to be heavily dominated by whales. Indeed, 241 addresses, each holding more than $1 million, collectively contributed 63% of the total ETH genesis value.

Retail investors holding $500–$5,000 in their wallets represent the largest group in terms of the number of contributors, making up 43% of contributors, but only 1.24% of contributions. The third-largest group by the number of contributors had 2,667 investors, who collectively contributed less than $1 million.

Coinbase

The data suggests that despite the modest contribution of investors with less capital in their wallets, they allocated larger fractions of their portfolios for FEI. The whales, meanwhile, bet on the Fei Protocol less heavily. 

Was demand short-lived?

Fei Protocol introduced a new stablecoin, FEI, which uses a dynamic burning mechanism to maintain the correct peg. To put it simply, the crucial feature of the protocol is that it incorporates a system that prevents users from selling FEI when the stablecoin is trading below the peg. The protocol has launched a decentralized autonomous organization with TRIBE governance tokens.

Fei Protocol’s genesis triggered excessive demand in the market as a result of the two entwined factors of the bonding curve design and the TRIBE governance token airdrop. Many users were hoping for quick returns, so they tried to buy FEI for a price below the peg while also receiving TRIBE tokens as a reward. However, the users who bet on the long-term development of the project were also allowed to pre-swap any percentage of their Fei genesis allocation for TRIBE.

Larger participants who exchanged their genesis allocation of FEI for TRIBE acted differently than smaller-sized addresses. The data shows larger contributors opted to receive about double the FEI/TRIBE when compared to the smaller-sized addresses. Whales were hungry for the protocol governance tokens, and they got what they wanted.

Framework Ventures

Almost three weeks after the Fei genesis event, the data suggests a decrease in value held by genesis participants in each group. Despite significant burn penalties, the genesis addresses are no longer holding the tokens, providing liquidity with them or staking them. 

All groups sold between 40% and 60% of their genesis value for a total decrease of 56%. The users holding $100,000–$500,000 in their addresses turned out to be the biggest contributors to the post-genesis FEI sell pressure, with roughly 65% of their genesis value sold.

Notably, the group with the smallest wallet size came second in quitting the protocol. Overall, the users with less capital (groups 5 to 10) were more likely to stop holding FEI than whales (groups 1 to 4).

Parafi Capital

Circling back to the comparison between FEI genesis contributions and user wallet size, a post-genesis comparison reveals that since the very beginning, FEI has struggled to restore the peg, while TRIBE has gone off the rails at $1.33, down 43% from its peak on April 4. 

After almost three rocky weeks for the Fei Protocol, the total value held by genesis participants has decreased significantly. What is important is that the distribution has stabilized relative to wallet size, so there are not as many clear outliers as during Fei genesis.